Annex 1. Издание 3. AMENDMENT 1 | Аэростандарт

Язык

RU EN

Вход

RU EN

Annex 1. Издание 3

AMENDMENT 1

Поставить на контроль

Получить доступ

Страницa:

ИНФО

Текст

Редакции

Изменяет

Ссылается

Упомянут

В папку

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES PERSONNEL LICENSING ANNEX 1 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION Amendment to T-HIRD EDITION Containing amendment numbered 152 Effective 1 July 1956 July 1956 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION

ANNEX 1 1 NOTES 0P.f NOTIFICATION OF DIFFERENCES AND FORM OF NOTIFICATION Introduction 1. The Council, in reviewing the notifications of differences received ip compliance with Article 38 of the Convention with respect to most of the recent Annexes, noted that in some cases they had not been entirely sltisfactory since the information given was not as complete as that desired. 2. This may have been due to a recognition by States that because of its scope and generality a literal interpretation of Article 38 would result in the reporting of differences becoming an unjustifiable burden in many instances. The consequence of this has been that the selection of items to be reported has been made by Contracting States on the basis of a realistic interpretation of the language of that Article. 3. More comprehensive reporting of differences than in the past is required, however, for two main reasons 3.1 to promote greater safety and efficiency in air navigation by ensuring that governmental and other agencies concerned with international civil aviation are made fully aware of all nation- al rules and practices in so far as they differ from those prescribed in the ICAO Standardsl 3.2 to improve the efficacy of the role played by ICAO in the dissemination of information on - the applic.ation of Annexes by States, - the choice of States in case of options, - the complementary rules applied by States. Such information is expected to lead to a more thorough knowledge of the views of Contract- ing States and to assist in he preparation of the work of future meetings. 4. The Council accordiugly has approved celtain principles for the guidance of Contracting States in determining which differeuces between their national regulations and practices and the inter- national Standards contained in Annexes, are reportable, ad has also approired material pmviding guid- ance to Contracting States in the notification of such differences. 4.1 The Council has also invited Contracting States to notify the Organization of differellces to Recommended Practices even though the notification of such differences is not required by Article 38 of the Convention. The guidance given by Council in relation to Standards applies ah to Recommended Practices.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

. . t ANNEX I Notification of differences consequent upon adoption of Amendment 152 to Annex 1 5. It is suggested that any differences may be conveniently classified as Type 1 - different in principle, from the corresponding ICAO Standard. That is, a different method is employed. Type 2 - less protective than the corresponding ICAO Standard. Type 3 - more exacting than the correspodng ICAO Standard. Note- Although such differences may not be notifiable under Alticle 38 a the Convention the knowledge of more exacting requirements being applied in national regulations is of special value and interest. Form in which the reporting of differences is desired Specimen Form Differences in respect of Amendment 152 to Annex 1 - Personnel Licensing Annex 1s Subparagraph, or main paragraph, or licence heading General Comment 6.4 3.2.1.5 Student, private,, commercial and senior commercial pilot L Nature of differences ---------- Type 1. Different method employed. Type 2. Less protective. Type 3. More exacting. Remarks Audiometric tests given on first examination only as equipment is not generally available to designated examiners. Ministry of Transport Rail transport tests are applied. No change envis- aged until international agreement can be reached on a "recognized colour perception lantern". Hearing requirement No. 2 is acceptable. No change envisaged. Same hearing requirement as for airline transport pilot.

ОБРАЗЕЦ