Annex 11. Издание 2. September 1952

Язык

RU EN

Вход

RU EN

Annex 11. Издание 2

September 1952

Поставить на контроль

Получить доступ

Страницa:

ИНФО

Текст

Редакции

Изменяет

Ссылается

Упомянут

В папку

Please destroy the existing Supplement at the end of your copy of Annex 11 - Second Edition and insert the following in its place, SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 11 - Second Edition ir Traffic Services Differences as of 1 September 1952 between the national regulations and practices of States and the corresponding International Standards contained in Annex 11, Second Edition as notified to ICAO in accordance with Article 38 ,of the Convention on 'Inter- national Civil Aviation. Published by authority of the Council INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION

Page 2 SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 11 Second Edition JIIST OF CONTRACTING STATES WHO HAVE NOTIFIED ICAO THAT NO DIFFERENCES WILL EXIST BET WEEN THEIR NATIONAL REGULATIONS AND PRACTICES AND THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF ANNEX 11 Second Edition AND ITS ATTACHMENTS DENMARK FINLAND INDONESIA IRELAND ITALY NETHERLANDS NORWAY UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA

SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 11 Second Edition Paae 3 LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES WHO 'ALTHOUGH NQTIFYlNG THAT NO DlFFERENCES EXIST BETWEEN THEIR NATIOKAL REGULATIONS AND PRACTICZS AND THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE FIRST EDITION OF ANNEX 11 HAVE NOT REPORTED CONCERNING AMENDMENTS NUMBERS 1 INCORPORATED IN THE SZCOND EDITION DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EGYPT LEBANON PAKISTAN PORTUGAL SYRIA Amendments Nos. 1-6 have been lncorporated in the Seconc Edition of Annex 11 in the following paragraphs i the note following the definition of "aerodrome trafficv - page 7 I 3. 4.2.2 - page 12 first clause 1 3.5. 1 a - page 13 5.2.1 3 a, b, c d - pages 15 16 6.2.1.3L6.2.1.3. 1 -page 18 2.7.3 - page 10 33.3 1 -page 12 3.5.1 b -page 13.

Page 4 SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX 1 1 Second Edition GENERAL COMMENTS AUST'RALIA Attachment A 3, 1 c A11 control areas have specified upper rimits, irrespective of tie existence of upper control areas. UNITED STATES 5.2.1.3 a The following is not to be considered as a differeEce but rather as an explanation of the United States method oi irnplemensation of the Stacdar d. In implementing the provisions of this paragraph as amended by zmendment, 4 the United States air traffic services unlts and the appropriate rescue co --ordination centre jointly determined whether, under the circumstances, there is a probability that the aircraft is ir, distress. This would be accomplished prior to notification to the Rescue Co-ordina- tion Centre by the Air Traffic Service-Uni that a 'distress phase" exists In accordaace with paragraph 5, 2.2. Attachment A Paragraph 2. 2 of Attachment A to Annex 11 implies that a control zone is required at any aerodrome used by IFR traffic, regardless of the provisions of paragraph 2. 4 of Annex 1 1 . At sow-e locations, where there is no control zane, the United States had approved instrument approach procedures to meet the requirement oi local airline operations. The nazure of these local operations, the density of air traffic, and meteorological conditions generally prevailing do not justify the designation and maintenance of a control zone. Ir- other respects the United States comlies with Annex 11, Chapter 2, paragraphs 2.'1. 1, 2.4, 2.5, and 2. 7. All United States eesignated inte rnationzl regular and alternat,e airports have control zones .

ОБРАЗЕЦ