Language
RUEN
ES
FR
AR
CH
Login
RUEN
ES
FR
AR
CH
Annex 17
CORRIGENDUM № 2
Buy access
INFO
Text
Editions
Modifies
Links To
Links From
In Catalogs
search
Annex 17 Eleventh Edition Corrigendum No.2 English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, Spanish 1/8/20 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SECURITY Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference ANNEX 17 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ELEVENTH EDITION MARCH 2020 CORRIGENDUM NO. 2 1. Please replace pages ATT-8 and ATT-10 to ATT-14 with the following replacement pages in Annex 17 Eleventh Edition bearing the following notation 2. Please record the entry of this Corrigendum on page iii. 1/8/20 Corr. 2
Attachment Annex 17 Security ATT-7 30/7/20 3.8.1 Contracting States shall establish appropriate controls over the entire travel document application, adjudication and issuance processes to ensure a high level of integrity and security. 3.9 Recommended Practice. Contracting States should incorporate biometric data in their machine readable travel documents in a contactless integrated circuit chip, as specified in Doc 9303, Machine Readable Travel Documents. Note. Doc 9303 does not support the incorporation of biometric data in visas. 3.9.1 Recommended Practice. Contracting States issuing or intending to issue eMRTDs should join the ICAO Public Key Directory PKD and upload their information to the PKD. 3.9.2 Recommended Practice. Contracting States implementing checks on eMRTDs at border controls should join the ICAO Public Key Directory PKD and use the information available from the PKD to validate eMRTDs at border controls. 3.10 Contracting States shall promptly report accurate information about stolen, lost, and revoked travel documents, issued by their State, to INTERPOL for inclusion in the Stolen and Lost Travel Documents SLTD database. 3.10.1 Recommended Practice. Each Contracting State should, as far as practicable, query, at entry and departure border control points, the travel documents of individuals travelling internationally against the INTERPOL Stolen and Lost Travel Documents SLTD database. . . . . . . I. Inspection of travel documents 3.32 Contracting States shall assist aircraft operators in the evaluation of travel documents presented by passengers, in order to deter fraud and abuse. 3.33 Recommended Practice. Contracting States should consider making arrangements with other Contracting States to permit the positioning of liaison officers at airports in order to assist aircraft operators to establish the validity and authenticity of the travel documents of embarking persons. 3.34 Aircraft operators shall take necessary precautions at the point of embarkation to ensure that persons are in possession of the documents prescribed by the States of transit and destination for control purposes as described in this chapter. 3.34.1 The public authorities of each Contracting State shall seize fraudulent, falsified or counterfeit travel documents. The public authorities shall also seize the travel documents of a person impersonating the rightful holder of the travel document. Such documents shall be removed from circulation immediately and returned to the appropriate authorities of the State named as issuer or to the resident Diplomatic Mission of that State, except in cases where public authorities retain documents for law enforcement purposes. The appropriate authorities of the State named as issuer or the Diplomatic Mission of that State shall be notified of such retention by the public authorities that seize the travel documents in question. 3.34.2 Contracting States shall not require aircraft operators to seize documents referred to in Standard 3.34.1. 3.34.3 Contracting States shall not require an aircraft operator to carry a passenger from a point of departure or transit, to the intended final destination, when the travel document presented by that passenger is determined by the State to be fraudulent, falsified or counterfeit, or is held by a person other than to whom the document was legitimately issued. Note. Nothing in this provision is to be construed so as to prevent the return of inadmissible passengers whose travel documents are fraudulent, falsified or counterfeit or held by an imposter, and have been seized by a Contracting State, in accordance with Standard 3.34.1 and who are travelling under a covering letter issued in accordance with Standard 5.7.
Annex 17 Security Attachment 30/7/20 ATT-8 3.34.4 Recommended Practice. Each Contracting State should consider the introduction of Automated Border Control ABC systems in order to facilitate and expedite the clearance of persons entering or departing by air. 3.34.5 Recommended Practice. Contracting States utilizing ABC systems should, pursuant to 3.9.2 and 3.10.1, use the information available from the PKD to validate eMRTDs, perform biometric matching to establish that the passenger is the rightful holder of the document, and query INTERPOLs Stolen and Lost Travel Documents SLTD database, as well as other border control records, to determine eligibility for border crossing. 3.34.6 Recommended Practice. Contracting States utilizing ABC systems should ensure that gates are adequately staffed while operational to ensure a smooth passenger flow and respond rapidly to safety and integrity concerns in the event of a system malfunction. . . . . . . N. Identification and entry of crew and other aircraft operators personnel . . . . . . 3.63 If Contracting States issue Crew Member Certificates, then these shall be issued only in the form of machine readable cards in accordance with the specifications of Doc 9303, Part 5. . . . . . . 3.65 CMCs and crew identity cards shall be issued only after a background check has been carried out by or on behalf of the relevant public authority. In addition, adequate controls such as a certification of employment status of an applicant prior to issuance, controls on blank card stock, and accountability requirements for issuing personnel, shall be placed on the issuance of CMCs and crew identity cards. . . . . . . CHAPTER 4. ENTRY AND DEPARTURE OF CARGO AND OTHER ARTICLES A. General . . . . . . 4.6 Contracting States shall not normally require the physical examination of cargo to be imported or exported and shall use risk management to determine which goods shall be examined and the extent of that examination. 4.7 Where practicable, in order to improve efficiency, modern screening or examination techniques shall be used to facilitate the physical examination of goods to be imported or exported. . . . . . . 1/8/20 Corr. 2
EXAMPLE
To view full book Buy access
EXAMPLE
To view full book Buy access
EXAMPLE
To view full book Buy access
EXAMPLE
To view full book Buy access
EXAMPLE
To view full book Buy access
EXAMPLE
To view full book Buy access
Table Of Contents